Issue范文精选解析（一）

　　雅思写作范文利用得当可以帮助大家赢得很不错的印象分,下面是一篇范文,考生们可仔细研读,寻找自己需要的点。

　　Topic 3

　　Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

　　Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.(参考第13、15、20、32、35、39、46、98、129、135、136、137、140题)

　　The issue of whether educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed is complicated. It is true that there is considerable support for the opinion that students should be encouraged to pursue any subject of personal interest. However, educational institutions exist to educate students, and with this goal in mind every step should be taken to ensure that students are successful in their studies. Allowing every student unfettered entry into any field of study would have a deleterious effect on this goal, therefore educational institutions must dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

　　One compelling argument in support of the statement is that students should be dissuaded from pursuing fields of study they are unlikely to be successful in because under performing students can have a deleterious effect on the quality of education for all other students in a class. If, contrary to the statement, all students were allowed entry into all fields of study, then the pace of classes would have to be decreased to allow for weaker students. As a result less material would be covered and quality of education would suffer accordingly. Simply stated, allowing students to pursue fields of study they are unlikely to succeed in is imprudent due to the negative effects such a practice would have on the quality of education for all students.

　　Another meaningful argument concerns the secondary focus of academic institutions. While it is true that education is the primary focus, the goal of student success should always be a close second. When considering that a primary focus of academic institutions is to ensure student success, there is no question that institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. This is especially true when the youthfulness of the majority of students is taken into account. A number of students are too inexperienced to make prudent academic decisions without assistance from academic institutions. In light of this, rather than allowing students to pursue fields of study that they have been determined to be unlikely to succeed in, institutions should provide guidance for students in finding the fields they are most likely to succeed in. Given the goals of academic institutions, the policy outlined in the statement just makes sense.

　　Opponents of this view may contend that it is difficult or even impossible to accurately determine which students will be successful in a field of study. For instance, in any field of study students admitted with perfect grade point averages and exam scores are often outperformed by students who only just met entrance requirements. While this point is duly noted, the argument is short-sighted in that it does not change the fact that education quality would still suffer if all students were allowed entry into all fields. Educational institutions regularly have thousands of students and policies that cannot be determined based on statistical outliers.

　　In light of the above, it becomes clear that in order to best ensure the education quality and success of students, educational institutions are responsible for dissuading students from pursuing fields of study they are unlikely to succeed in. In instituting such a policy, though some students may be discouraged from pursuing fields that they are capable of performing well in, the education quality and success of the student body as a whole would be improved and these goals must remain the most important to educational institutions.

　　范文脉络

　　题目要求考生围绕“教育机构有责任劝导学生不去研究他们不太可能成功的领域”这一论断论述个人观点。考生无论持何种立场，都要在论述中重点驳斥与己方观点相左的一方可能会使用的有力论据和例子。

　　范文的具体思路如下：

　　全篇以“教育机构的目标”为切入点，论述了“教育机构必须劝导学生不去研究他们不太可能成功的领域”的观点。全文呈现总(第1段)—分(第2至4段)—总(第5段)的段落关系。

　　部分：[总述]支持题干观点，并点明论点“教育机构必须劝导学生不去研究他们不太可能成功的领域”。

　　1) 一方面，我们应该鼓励学生钻研自己感兴趣的领域。

　　2) 另一方面，教育机构的存在是为了教育学生，这要求教育机构保证学生在学业上取得成功。

　　3) 让学生毫无限制地学习各个领域的知识会影响教育机构达到自身目的。

　　第二部分：[分述]论证教育机构为什么要阻止学生任其兴趣发展。

　　(一) 不限制学生学习的领域会对教学质量产生不良的影响：

　　1) 学习落后的学生会影响同班其他同学所受教育的质量。

　　2) 如果学生什么都可以学，教学进度必然将放慢，以便让落后的学生能够跟上。

　　3) 课堂教授的内容减少，教学质量相应降低。

　　(二) 教育机构首要的关注点是保证学生学业成功：

　　1) 学生学业上的成功和教育一样重要。

　　2) 某些学生太年轻、缺乏经验：

　　①没有教育机构的帮助，学生不能做出谨慎的课业选择。

　　②教育机构应该为学生提供指导，帮助学生找到最可能成功的领域。

　　3) 根据教育机构的目标，支持题干观点。

　　(三) 驳斥与己方相左的观点：

　　1) 有人认为不可能准确地判断学生可能会成功的领域。

　　① 例如，入学分数高的学生常常被压线入学的学生反超。

　　2) 但是，允许学生学习任何他们喜欢的领域，还是会降低教学质量。

　　3) 教育机构通常有数千学生，他们没有教育经验，不能决定教育政策。

　　第三部分：[总述]总结并重申论点“为了保障教育质量和学生的学业成功，教育机构要劝导学生不去从事不太可能成功的领域”。

　　1) 有些学生可能会受到劝阻，没有进入自己也可以取得成绩的领域。

　　2) 但是，教学质量和学生整体的课业成功程度将提高。

》》》》 青岛新航道专注于青岛雅思培训， 更多雅思考试资讯可点击青岛新航道官网咨询