亚太地区SAT考试落下帷幕的，目前收到的反馈来看，此次亚太地区出现了三套不同的试卷，分别是(东11区)一套，韩国一套，香港澳门新加坡亚太地区一套。

　　有些考生反映此次SAT难度大于5、6月份考试，这是很可能的，毕竟赶着ED申请，根据以往经验，每年10月份的考试往往是一年里最难的，考试人数也是最多的一次。紧接着11月的考试，根据往年规律，难度会有所降低，如果这次不太理想，请尽快报名一下11月份的考试(很快就要截止)。同时也提醒2017年申请的同学，尽量在上半年1月，5月和6月，甚至是8月(明年有8月考试)的考试中考出满意的分数，也可以避免10月份紧张的状况。此外，特别提醒，如果觉得此次考试不理想，又想取消成绩的同学，请务必记得在下周三之前，通过传真、电话的方式取消自己的成绩!

　　关于2016年10月1日SAT写作真题

　　文章名为“Read, Kids, Read”，选自2014年5月《纽约时报》。作者是Frank Bruni.

　　文章主题鲜明，生动而灵活。作者使用了personal anecdote, quotation, authoritative reference, conversational tone等主要写作手法，以及metaphor, hyperbole等修辞手法。

　　学生感受：文章风格比较平实，思路清楚，难度不高。比较容易找到作者的写作手法。

　　2016年10月01日新SAT考试亚太写作真题--Read, Kids, Read

　　As an uncle I’m inconsistent about too many things.

　　Birthdays, for example. My nephew Mark had one on Sunday, and I didn’t remember — and send a text — until 10 p.m., by which point he was asleep.

　　School productions, too. I saw my niece Bella in “Seussical: The Musical” but missed “The Wiz.” She played Toto, a feat of trans-species transmogrification that not even Meryl, with all of her accents, has pulled off.

　　But about books, I’m steady. Relentless. I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more. I’m reliably hurling novels at them, and also at friends’ kids. I may well be responsible for 10 percent of all sales of “The Fault in Our Stars,” a teenage love story to be released as a movie next month. Never have I spent money with fewer regrets, because I believe in reading — not just in its power to transport but in its power to transform.

　　So I was crestfallen on Monday, when a new report by Common Sense Media came out. It showed that 30 years ago, only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds said that they “hardly ever” or never read for pleasure. Today, 22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of 17-year-olds say that. Fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure “almost every day.” Back in 1984, 31 percent did. What a marked and depressing change.

　　I know, I know: This sounds like a fogy’s crotchety lament. Or, worse, like self-interest. Professional writers arguing for vigorous reading are dinosaurs begging for a last breath. We’re panhandlers with a better vocabulary.

　　But I’m coming at this differently, as someone persuaded that reading does things — to the brain, heart and spirit — that movies, television, video games and the rest of it cannot.

　　There’s research on this, and it’s cited in a recent article in The Guardian by Dan Hurley, who wrote that after “three years interviewing psychologists and neuroscientists around the world,” he’d concluded that “reading and intelligence have a relationship so close as to be symbiotic.”

　　In terms of smarts and success, is reading causative or merely correlated? Which comes first, “The Hardy Boys” or the hardy mind? That’s difficult to unravel, but several studies have suggested that people who read fiction, reveling in its analysis of character and motivation, are more adept at reading people, too: at sizing up the social whirl around them. They’re more empathetic. God knows we need that.

　　Late last year, neuroscientists at Emory University reported enhanced neural activity in people who’d been given a regular course of daily reading, which seemed to jog the brain: to raise its game, if you will.

　　Some experts have doubts about that experiment’s methodology, but I’m struck by how its findings track something that my friends and I often discuss. If we spend our last hours or minutes of the night reading rather than watching television, we wake the next morning with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled. Reading has bequeathed what meditation promises. It has smoothed and focused us.

　　Maybe that’s about the quiet of reading, the pace of it. At Success Academy Charter Schools in New York City, whose students significantly outperform most peers statewide, the youngest kids all learn and play chess, in part because it hones “the ability to focus and concentrate,” said Sean O’Hanlon, who supervises the program. Doesn’t reading do the same?

　　Daniel Willingham, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia, framed it as a potentially crucial corrective to the rapid metabolism and sensory overload of digital technology. He told me that it can demonstrate to kids that there’s payoff in “doing something taxing, in delayed gratification.” A new book of his, “Raising Kids Who Read,” will be published later this year.

　　Before talking with him, I arranged a conference call with David Levithanand Amanda Maciel. Both have written fiction in the young adult genre, whose current robustness is cause to rejoice, and they rightly noted that the intensity of the connection that a person feels to a favorite novel, with which he or she spends eight or 10 or 20 hours, is unlike any response to a movie.

　　That observation brought to mind a moment in “The Fault in Our Stars” when one of the protagonists says that sometimes, “You read a book and it fills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.”

　　Books are personal, passionate. They stir emotions and spark thoughts in a manner all their own, and I’m convinced that the shattered world has less hope for repair if reading becomes an ever smaller part of it.

　　这次亚太试卷SAT写作阅读原文出自纽约时报：http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/13/opinion/bruni-read-kids-read.html

　　据说官方今后将会放出本次考试的真题，想了解更多关于SAT考试资讯可关注青岛新航道官网。